The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that the dispositive and party provision principles, even though not expressly mentioned among the formative principles of the process
in Article 425 of the Labor Code, they are actually configured as principles in the labor procedure. In order to verify this assertion, the laws which give regulatory configuration to the above principles will be examined. Indeed, it is our intention to make a complete analysis of the principles involved, clearly delimiting their manifestations and content in order to avoid
any confusion between them and other formative principles of the labor procedure. This
is so because a false conception of these principles has led part of the doctrine and jurisprudence to hold a wrong concept of them, thus rejecting the initiative for judicial probation for considering it as a violation of the dispositive principle. We will make note that such view is wrong, from a clear conceptual demarcation between the principles that are
being analyzed, being as it is perfectly possible to reconcile both the dispositive and party
provision principles.
Keywords:
Dispositive principle, party provision principle, judicial proof iniciative
Author Biography
Raúl Fernández Toledo, Universidad de Chile
Profesor instructor Departamento de Derecho del Trabajo Universidad de Chile
Fernández Toledo, R. (2016). Los principios dispositivo y aportación de parte en el proceso laboral. su incidencia en la iniciativa probatoria judicial. Revista Chilena De Derecho Del Trabajo Y De La Seguridad Social, 2(3), pp. 37–53. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-7551.2011.42925
